| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. proposal: DIET nano - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: mxzf wrote: This will give sniper fleets plenty of warning to warp off if they choose to disengage. Because sniper fleets should get a free pass rather than take risks. Why have I seen this attitude about sni...
- by Arbiter Reborn - at 2011.11.11 20:43:00
|
2. proposal: DIET nano - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
DISCLAIMER: this is not a good old day thread i never did much nano, during the time i mostly flew locus zealots (60km pulses were win) this wont be a return to 10k sacreliges or 17k machariels taking no missile damage this thread asumes t...
- by Arbiter Reborn - at 2011.11.07 12:02:00
|
3. POS Flogging the old horse for the new forums - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
DOUBLE POST FAIL
- by Arbiter Reborn - at 2011.10.19 19:29:00
|
4. POS Flogging the old horse for the new forums - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
priority 1 !!! priority 2 THE REST OF THE UI / GUI
- by Arbiter Reborn - at 2011.10.19 19:28:00
|
5. [Proposal] Advanced Infomorph Psychology - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
yeh, i mean why not
- by Arbiter Reborn - at 2011.10.12 16:33:00
|
6. [proposal] limit gang links to a single grid - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
t3 are supposed to be more specialised, i think if you want a particular bonus only and want it as strong as possible t3 should be the ship you use, t3 boosting is just the new falcon alt. its a serious amount of bonus you get here. not to menti...
- by Arbiter Reborn - at 2011.09.28 03:04:00
|
7. [Proposal] CCP, commit to excellence. No features left behind. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
i have a feeling this should be brought up in a csm meeting too tbh. definatly supported, oh and you diddnt even mentioin the terrible ui and general cleaning up of it, ie setting multiple jobs, still not possible after nearly 7 years?
- by arbiter reborn - at 2010.05.30 21:50:00
|
8. Strengthen webs by 10% - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: arbiter reborn on 30/05/2010 21:44:02 Originally by: Fon Revedhort Edited by: Fon Revedhort on 30/05/2010 19:58:03 I disagree. If anything, they should remove MWD-disabling effect from the scramber, replacing it with ef...
- by arbiter reborn - at 2010.05.30 21:43:00
|
9. [Proposal] New T2 Destroyers - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
t1 destroyers are already poerfull v frigs, although there are some imbalances between them, i wouldnt mid seeing a small logistics destroyer but really id like to see them balance dictors better
- by arbiter reborn - at 2009.12.01 15:31:00
|
10. [Issue] POS: Flogging the Dead Horse Be Recommended for Implementation - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
omg agreeing with cva
- by arbiter reborn - at 2009.06.01 16:42:00
|
11. [Issue] The EVE Font - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
yeh zeez
- by arbiter reborn - at 2009.05.30 17:14:00
|
12. More orbit range options. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
i would like to also add that being able to change the axis of our orbits manually would be nice
- by arbiter reborn - at 2009.05.30 17:11:00
|
13. [Issue] Capital bumping is now completely absurd - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
- by arbiter reborn - at 2009.05.30 17:09:00
|
14. [Proposal] Apply Racial Shield Resist Bonus to all T1 Ships - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
maybee im just angry at the ninja drake boost this entails, i see what youre saying and yes i think its unfair that caldari and some minmitar loose out on the extra resist, im just not sure if a blanket shield resist is the answer, also i dont ...
- by arbiter reborn - at 2009.05.30 14:44:00
|
15. Supercapitals revised - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Butter Dog Yes, thats pretty much what I was thinking too! an anti cap role would just make titans the new dreds, the area of effect poroposal is sound, it would be a big decision to deploy titans after a change lik...
- by arbiter reborn - at 2009.05.30 14:23:00
|
16. [Proposal] Apply Racial Shield Resist Bonus to all T1 Ships - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
well the rp argument doesnt work too well, mainly because why would amarr desighners concentrate so much on shields, if youre idea were to go through it would make more sense to have it put on the ships tank, but anyway the pinicle of shield and a...
- by arbiter reborn - at 2009.05.30 14:16:00
|
17. [Proposal] Sentry Guns don't engage drones - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
meh im not too sure about this one, i like the idea that a pirate gatecamp is at a disadvantage when it comes to stuff like that, all i know is that when im solo engaging outlaws there drons being killed has saved me a few times, pirates general...
- by arbiter reborn - at 2009.05.30 14:11:00
|
18. Supercapitals revised - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
absolutley and completely yes, super caps need reajusting now, i say olimpians should have that emeryan age vid wepon
- by arbiter reborn - at 2009.05.29 18:59:00
|
19. [Issue] Factional Warfare, Lack of Development - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: ITTigerClawIK Edited by: ITTigerClawIK on 26/05/2009 20:02:35 FW is in dire need of a complete re-think and overhaul, it needs better objectives, better rewards and better consequences.
- by arbiter reborn - at 2009.05.29 18:39:00
|
20. [Proposal] Change to agro mechanics ref Outlaws - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
yuppers
- by arbiter reborn - at 2009.05.29 18:34:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |